By Mark
28 Dec 2009

defrocked_priest_michael_bakerFirst of all, I find the child abuse scandal in the Catholic Church repugnant and appalling. When the story first broke, my heart broke with it.  I was so shocked and saddened I almost left the church for good. In fact had the church not started taking action and denouncing the deviant behavior of the scum in its clergy pool, I would have left without hesitation. The question I find myself asking now–esp in the face of the Ireland scandal– is this: Is the church doing enough to clean the scum?

Before proceeding I should offer a little background: I am Catholic and I love the church. My mother was a devout Catholic and as a result our family might have missed a total of two or three masses growing up. My siblings and I received all the sacraments, and the ceremonies and receptions for each were as germane to our childhood as the bar/bat mitzvahs are to the Jew’s. We were raised with a strong moral code, and the power and necessity of self denial and agape love were demonstrated to us by example–day in and day out in our home. I credit the church for the order, stability and morality in my home as a kid. Enough said. I don’t question the church. I question the handling of this nightmare spectacle.

It’s not as though the church isn’t doing anything. They are–at least in the U.S. The question is: are they doing enough?  They have paid out tens of millions in settlements, and seven U.S. dioceses have filed for bankruptcy as a result[i].  Who’s footing the bill? Who else? Parishioners– to the tune of $8 million in the case of this diocese[ii].   Imagine that: Christ’s followers spending their hard-earned money to bail the church out of a sex-crime crisis.

Strangely, only a handful of bishops have stepped down for what many to believe to be a cover-up of the crimes.  Nowhere is this more prevalent than in Ireland where the latest fire has broken out for the church. The church there–home of 4 million Catholics–is being accused of covering up the crimes of 170 pedophile priests. Only four bishops have stepped down thus far. Two stepped down during Christmas mass this year! “Merry Christmas and God bless. By the way I participated in a cover up that denied justice for hundreds of children whose innocence was robbed in the very place it is supposed to be preserved. I quit.”

I’ve only scratched the surface. You can read all about this horror movie at http://www.bishop-accountability.org/. The good folks there faithfully track the scandal, the payouts, the perps, and so forth. I commend them for what they do. Somebody has to. If the public did not continue to demand the church address these atrocities, they might very well still be happening. I join the legions of voices demanding a FULL ACCOUNTING “for all the records of how abusive priests were dealt with and for bishops to face the canonical and legal consequences of their mismanagement, above and beyond apologies.”

As a steadfast Catholic and defender of the faith I continue to be shocked by the scope of these horrors and I implore the pope and Vatican to cleanse the church of every criminal who participated in or covered up the heinous crimes against children. They are all a DISGRACE to the church and a DISGRACE to its leader,  Jesus Christ.  The apologies and payouts are not enough. I believe a full accounting is necessary.

After the first of the four Irish bishops resigned recently,  David Clohessy (Survivor’s Network) said,

“We hope his resignation will bring some comfort to the thousands of suffering Irish clergy sex abuse victims and hundreds of thousands of betrayed Irish parishioners. But this should only be the beginning of systemic change within the corrupt church hierarchy.”

I’ll drink [a Mountain Dew] to that. And I will add that there are MILLIONS of Catholics worldwide who continue to be embarrassed by this freak show scandal and DEMAND more transparency on the part of the church going forward so this never happens again. We’re also sick of paying for it. To the church: Stop sweeping this under the rug and get it all out in the open so we can purge the criminals from our ranks and move on with the healing and rebuilding process.

Image: Defrocked priest Michael Baker with victim Dominic Zamora–then and now. www.bishop-accountability.org

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post Post to Facebook Facebook

  1. http://www.bishop-accountability.org/bankruptcy.htm []
  2. http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news2007/11_12/2007_12_29_Stucke_ParishesCollect.htm []
Post Electron Microscope Darwin Says:That's what I love about finches and pigeons, they are such law abiding citizens, as everything in God's world is.. except humans.

11 Comments

  1. GCT
    28/12/2009

    The only reason they are doing anything at all is because they got caught. Previous to that they were also making payments, but as hush money. Nice place you got there. They facilitated the abuse and now the people who were abused are paying the church to pay back the people who were abused.

  2. Mark
    28/12/2009

    You’re love of hasty generalizations notwithstanding, the rogue behavior of the deviant priest faction is NOT the “sum” of Catholicism.

  3. GCT
    29/12/2009

    No, but I think the consistent cover-ups, secret pay-offs, and shuffling around of predators so that they can attack other children does show the “sum” of the church and that the behavior isn’t so “rogue” as you would have us believe.

  4. Richard
    29/12/2009

    So GCT you are saying the entire Catholic Church leadership is poisoned and the institution as a whole is hopelessly doomed?

  5. GCT
    30/12/2009

    I think the institution is hopeless because it is a force for evil in the world. Child mistreatment, AIDS in Africa, charlatans like mother theresa, treatment of gays and women, etc. I don’t see a lot of priests standing up and saying that these things are wrong.

  6. Mark
    31/12/2009

    I think the institution is hopeless because it is a force for evil in the world. Child mistreatment, AIDS in Africa, charlatans like mother theresa, treatment of gays and women, etc. I don’t see a lot of priests standing up and saying that these things are wrong.

    A force for evil. LOL. And what exactly is this “evil” thing you are talking about? Your hero Dawkins says there is no such thing. Please do explain.

  7. alemonope
    01/01/2010

    “A force for evil. LOL. And what exactly is this “evil” thing you are talking about? Your hero Dawkins says there is no such thing. Please do explain.”

    Yes go ahead and stuff more words into other people’s mouths. How typically christian.

  8. GCT
    01/01/2010

    I agree with alemonope. You’re very good at speaking for other people and getting it all wrong. I believe you are arguing in bad faith and wasting my and everyone else’s time.

  9. Mark
    01/01/2010

    Arguing in “bad faith” huh?

    “The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, *****no evil****** and no good, nothing but blind pitiless indifference.” — Richard Dawkins, River Out of Eden: A Darwinian View of Life (1995)

    “The universe that we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil, no good, nothing but pitiless indifference.”– Richard Dawkins, “God’s Utility Function,” published in Scientific American (November, 1995), p. 85

    Now please, GCT, get off your ad hominem trip for a few minutes and tell me what you mean by “evil.”

    And if I’m wasting your time, then please don’t let the door hit you in the butt on the way out. I thought we could have some good debate, but I see you are increasingly sinking further into the ad hominem abyss with every post, so perhaps we should sever our discussion because I’m not interested in mudslinging.

    [alemonope, you eliminated yourself from any intelligible debate when you came on here and called me a "nincompoop" in your first post. Please leave if you can't speak your mind without ridicule.]

  10. GCT
    04/01/2010

    Now please, GCT, get off your ad hominem trip for a few minutes and tell me what you mean by “evil.”

    First off, you should learn what an ad hominem is.
    Secondly, I was correct in my assessment that you’ve got it all wrong. What Dawkins is expressing is that the universe does not contain inherent properties like evil, good, etc. That does not mean that humans can not define concepts like “evil,” such that those concepts do exist in our perception of the universe.

    And if I’m wasting your time, then please don’t let the door hit you in the butt on the way out. I thought we could have some good debate, but I see you are increasingly sinking further into the ad hominem abyss with every post, so perhaps we should sever our discussion because I’m not interested in mudslinging.

    It’s not about mud slinging, but about you consistently ignoring what I and others write and then claiming victory for burning the straw men you’ve erected. I’m asking you if that is because you are doing it on purpose (which would be a waste of my time) or if you simply don’t follow the argument. The latter could possibly be fixed, and I’m willing to spend some time if you aren’t engaging in the former.

  11. alemonope
    04/01/2010

    LOL, “intelligible debate” is that what you call what you are doing on atheist forums Dino? No of course not, you’re just trolling for some site hits. But you can go ahead and fool yourself into believing otherwise.

    GCT: “No, but I think the consistent cover-ups, secret pay-offs, and shuffling around of predators so that they can attack other children does show the “sum” of the church and that the behavior isn’t so “rogue” as you would have us believe.”

    Isn’t it quite interesting that the guy in charge of the internal investigations of child molestations is the same guy that got elected Pope?

Have Your Say

Markup Controls

Powered by WP Hashcash